Moriah Primitive Baptist Church

Madison County, Georgia

Articles in this archive 

Sing Not Play July 7, 2006 Initial & add On Gifts July 14, 2006
Replacing Spiritual Leaders July 21, 2006 A Christian's Ships - July 28, 2006
Preaching Specifically August 4, 2006 A Bit Part but a Great Role August 11, 2006
Forsaking & Re-Forsaking August 18, 2006 No Patten was his Pattern August 25, 2006
Scoured Absalom - September 1, 2006 Any Regrets September 8, 2006
Would they Pick You? September 15, 2006 The Lesser Offering  September 22, 2006
The Scientific Method September 29, 2006  
   

 

Sing, not Play
(July 7, 2006)



The following definitions were taken from the Oxford English Dictionary:  1) sing - to utter words with musical inflections;  2) song - vocal music;  3) play - to perform instrumental music;  and 4) tune - succession of musical notes produced by an instrument or voice.  Using these definitions consider the scripture below:

Col 3:16  -  Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly in all wisdom;  teaching and admonishing one another in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing with grace in your hearts to the Lord.  Can a piano teach?  Can an organ admonish?  Does a guitar have grace or a heart?  No, but a singing saint does.

Eph 5:19  -  Speaking to yourselves in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing and making melody in your heart to the Lord.  Can a flute articulate a psalm or a hymn?  Can a drum utter a spiritual song?  Does a cymbal have a heart or utter to the Lord?  No, but a singing saint can.

1Cor 14:15  -  I will pray with the spirit, and I will pray with understanding also; I will sing with the spirit, and I will sing with understanding also.  Does a musical instrument have or give understanding?  No, but a singing saint does and can.

Heb 2:12  -  Saying, I will declare thy name unto my brethren, in the midst of the church will I sing praise unto thee.  Can a musical instrument declare the Lord’s name?  Can an instrument offer praise?  No, but a singing saint can.

Primitive Baptists worship without musical instruments.  Here are a few non-PB’s who advocated acappella worship.  Aquinas (a Catholic) believed it, Luther (a Lutheran) practiced it, Calvin (a Reformist) employed it, Wesley (a Methodist) insisted on it, Spurgeon (a Baptist) demanded it, Girardeau (a Presbyterian) defended it, McGarvey (a Cambelite) taught it, and the Greek church continues to do it.  How and why did so many leave acappella worship?

Top

Initial & Add-on Gifts
(July 14, 2006)



The Bible often couples spiritual gifts with a command to:  grow, increase, add to …    Let us consider a few gifts so as to understand how this happens:

If any lack wisdom, ask God  -  Jam 1:5.  A fool will not ask for wisdom  -  Rom 3:11.  It takes wisdom to ask for wisdom.  Whence does initial wisdom come?  How does add-on wisdom come?  God gives both, but initial is given to passive man and add-on is given to active man.  Solomon is an example of a man who had wisdom, yet asked for more wisdom  -  1Ki 3:5, 11-12.

If any desire the Holy Spirit, ask God  -  Luke 11:13.  A depraved man will not ask for the Spirit  -  1Cor 2:14.  It takes a portion of the Spirit to ask for the Spirit.  Whence does initial Spirit come?  How does add-on Spirit come?  God gives both, but initial is given to passive man and add-on is given to active man.  Elisha is an example of a man who had the Spirit, yet asked for more of the Spirit  -  2Ki 2:1-15.

Increase my faith  -  Luke 17:3-5.  A man without faith can not ask for faith  -  Rom 8:7-8.  It takes a certain amount of faith to ask for faith.  Whence does initial faith come?  How does add-on faith come?  God gives both, but initial is given to passive man and add-on is given to active man.  The lunatic’s father is an example of a man who had faith, yet asked for more faith  -  Mark 9:20-29.

Those with love, increase  -  Php 1:9.  A man without love will not ask for a greater capacity to love  -  Eph 2:1-3.  It takes love to want to love more.  Whence does initial love come?  How does add-on love come?  God gives both, but initial is given to passive man and add-on is given to active man.  The Thessalonian Church is an example of a group who had love, yet sought to love more  -  1Th 4:9-10.

Wisdom, faith, love, and ministries of the Holy Spirit are multifaceted.  May we thank God for initial gifts, and seek the add-on.

Top

 

Replacing Spiritual Leaders
(July 21, 2006)


The Book of Ezekiel was written after Jerusalem fell into Babylonian hands.  Its 34th chapter tells the primary cause of that fall.  Verses 1 through 10 describe poor leadership.

Israeli kings (& Judah) forgot they were called to feed the people, but rather fed off the people.  The kings did not search for the lost, bind the broken, or mend the sick.   They were not attentive to the people.  Instead, the kings scattered, oppressed, and devoured.  God, having had enough of these men, shifted their duties to the priesthood.

Six hundred years later, Jesus arrived in Jerusalem and found an inattentive priesthood.  Jewish priests forgot they were God’s servants.  The priests were not feeding the people, but feeding off the people  -  Matt 23:14.   The priesthood was not searching for the lost, binding the broken, or mending the sick  -  Matt 23:25-34.  God, having had enough of these men, transferred their duties to pastors.

Let us fast forward 2000 more years and consider today’s spiritual leaders.  1)  God created the office of pastor to oversee the local church.  Given the above, what do you think God will do to pastors who become inattentive to their flocks?  who feed off their flocks, instead of feeding them?  He just might shift the pastor’s duties to another:  to committees, to deacons, or to spiritual women.  God may allow this to happen not out of design, but in judgment.  2)  God created the office of father to oversee the family.  What do you suspect God will do to fathers who become inattentive to their families?  I speculate the family’s oversight may shift to another:  to mothers, or to children  -  Is 3:12.  God may allow this to happen not out of design, but in judgment.

When those God places in leadership roles drop the ball, He passes their duties to others;  not out of design, but in judgment.  May God, forgive us and help us to repent of neglecting our leadership responsibilities.


Top

A Christian’s Ships
(July 28, 2006)



According to Acts 11:26, the definition of a Christian is two-fold.  Yes, a Christian is a person who follows the teachings of Jesus Christ, but a Christian is also a person who assembles with other believers.  Most are familiar with the first half of this definition, but the second half of the definition isn’t nearly as prolific. 

Understanding the following qualities (six ships) will help a child of God better comprehend his or her role as a Christian:

1)  Worship [to honor or revere, adore with extreme devotion] - our state of reverence toward God ought to be proclaimed collectively and individually, with our mouths and with our feet, as Israel did in Neh 8:5-6, 16.
2)  Sonship [the position, state, or relation of a son] -  think of the brotherhood that would exist when we  truly realize (and act like) we each have been given the same name, receive correction alike, and await the same inheritance  -  Heb 12:5-8, 1Jn 3:1-2. 
3)  Fellowship [participation, companionship, company with one another] - we should be as a team of oarsmen operating in unison  -  Neh 8:1, Act 1:14.
4)  Leadership [the position of directing by going in front] - not to be confused by a manager who is over or a coach who is behind, but as Gaius in 3Jn 1-6.  Paul followed Christ, we are to follow Paul, but let us not forget our children, a babe in Christ, or the silent neighbor who follows us.
5)  Stewardship [an official who controls the domestic affairs of a household] - we ought to act as if the talents entrusted us are ours, all the while remembering they are God’s.  Joseph was a faithful steward under Potiphar, the prison warden, and Pharaoh  -  Gen 39:4-6, 21-23, 41:40.
6)  Discipleship [one who attends upon another for the purpose of learning] - we ought to be ever learning, yet expecting to teach  -  Heb 5:12, as Peter needed teaching before he taught  -  Act 10:5-17.

May God help us become better Christians as we consider these principles.


Top

Preaching Specifically
(August 4, 2006)



A brother in the ministry whom I have a lot of respect shares the following advice with younger ministers.  He says, "Don’t tell someone to do something unless you’ve told them how to do it."  The advice is sound.  I wouldn’t ask my son to plow a field or repair a leaky roof without ever having shown him how to do so; however, I dread to think how many times I’ve done exactly that by speaking in generalities from the pulpit about Bible principles.

Recorded in scripture is a description of Ezra’s preaching during a revival meeting.  Neh 8:8 says Ezra, "gave the sense, and caused them to understand the reading."  How did Ezra do this? 

We may not have the entirety of Ezra’s sermon, but we have a sample of Jesus’ systematic approach in the Sermon on Mount.  Consider how Jesus taught:  1)  In Matt 5:20, Jesus preached commandment keeping (or true righteousness).  He taught the essence of this truth using five separate laws:  5:21 - thou shall not kill;  5:27 - adultery;  5:33 - oaths;  5:38 - revenge;  5:43 -  love.  Notice, the explanation of each law was followed with a real life application.  Jesus was specific.  His teaching was up close and personal.  2)  In Matt 5:46, Jesus preached against seeking the praise of men.  He taught the essence of this truth using three examples:  6:1 - alms;  6:5 - prayer;  6:16 - fasts.  The explanation of each example was followed by suggestions so as better understand.  Notice, Jesus’ discussion on prayer went as far as to provide a sample prayer.  Jesus was specific.  Jesus’ preaching was real.

Jesus Christ is not the only preacher recorded in scripture who taught systematically.  Paul’s teaching was very direct, and Paul told his sons in the ministry to preach in the same manner.  So when your preacher gets specific, don’t jump to the conclusion he is in attack mode.  Assume he is following a Bible-based pattern.

 

Top

 

A Bit Part, but a Great Role
August 11, 2006



Scripture says there was no prophet greater than John the Baptist, yet his ministry lasted only six months  -  Mark 1:14.  What was it about John’s ministry that put him second to none?  Elijah, Elisha, Samuel, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Daniel, nor could any O.T. prophet claim superiority to John  -  Luke 7:28.

John’s role was like the man who introduces our president at a State of the Union address.  The Senate’s Sergeant of Arms enters a full cabinet, gains the Speaker of the House’s attention, and shouts, "Mr. Speaker, the President of the United States."  The President enters, all rise, and the Sergeant of Arms slips silently away.  John the Baptist’s role is much the same:  John announced the arrival of Jesus Christ, Jesus entered His public ministry, and John slipped silently away.

In many ways, John was like a rooster.  The Jewish day had 12 hours of darkness followed by 12 hours of light.  The O.T. was a period of shadows followed by the N.T., a period of great light  -  1Cor 12:13, Matt 4:16.  A rooster announces the coming of day, the arrival of the sun.  John the Baptist announced the coming of light, the arrival of the morning star, the day star  -  John 1:8, Rev 22:16, 2Pe 1:19.

Consider how quickly John the Baptist began directing his converts to Jesus  -  John 1:35-37.  No doubt John baptized hundreds, maybe thousands; yet, John backed out of the picture as Jesus began His public ministry.  That is exactly why John the Baptist was called great.  For the verse which calls John great also says, "he that is least in the kingdom of God is greater than he"  -  Luke 7:28.

Doing the work of a servant is the lesson Jesus taught the disciples after their first communion service  -  Luke 22:26.  It is the lesson taught by Christ’s foot washing example  -  John 13:4-17.  In terms of longevity, John the Baptist was given a bit part.  In terms of importance, John played a great role.  May we play the role of a servant with John’s greatness.

Top

 

Forsaking & Re-forsaking
August 18, 2006



Jesus called Andrew, Peter, James, and John at the beginning of His ministry.  At the time of their calling,  Andrew & Peter were fishing, and James & John were mending nets.  Jesus said, "I will make you fishers of men" and commanded the four to follow Him.  Scripture says the four forsook their nets and followed Jesus  -  Mark 1:16-20.

A short time later we find these four men fishing again.  It appears the four had not altogether forsaken their nets.  True, the men accompanied Jesus on a preaching trip and during that trip they witnessed some remarkable things:  the casting out of an unclean spirit and the healing of Peter’s mother in-law  -  Luke 4:33-39.  But, the four returned to their fishing.  They toiled unsuccessfully all night, then Jesus gave them so many fish their ships sank.  Again Jesus said, "I will make you fishers of men."  Scripture says the four re-forsook their nets and followed Jesus  -  Luke 5:1-11.

About 3½ years later we find three of the four back at sea.  It appears Peter, James, and John had not completely rid themselves of their nets.  They toiled unsuccessfully all night, then Jesus gave them so many fish their nets broke.  Jesus gave them more fish than they could handle.  Jesus’ response was much like God’s in the wilderness, "You want quail?  I’ll give you quail!"  "You want fish?  I’ll give you fish!"  -   John 21:1-19.

As the fish were brought in, John elbowed Peter and said, "I’m getting that deja vous feeling."  How many times have we forsaken something we know the Lord would have us leave off, only to find ourselves being reminded by a sermon or a passage of scripture, "Hey, I’ve given that up once before."  Let us consider two realities of Peter’s experience:  1) the Lord loved Peter enough to rebuke and recharge him, and 2) the Lord was serious enough to brake Peter’s nets.  May we forsake and re-forsake our nets to do the Lord’s service.

 

Top

 

No Pattern was His Pattern
August 25, 2006



Jesus Christ taught in a variety of manners.  He taught using diverse methods and means.  Consider:
*  Sometimes Jesus taught in temples, and other times on hillsides  -  Matt 4:23, 5:1.
*  Sometimes Jesus taught in houses, and other times from a boat  -  Mark 2:1-2, Luke 5:3.
*  Sometimes Jesus taught while standing, and other times He sat.
*  Sometimes Jesus spoke to great crowds, and other times He spoke to a few  -  Mark 6:2, 8:27.
*  Sometimes Jesus taught via formal discourses, and other times He allowed dialogue.
In terms of method, no pattern was Jesus’ pattern.  BUT, effectiveness was always Jesus’ pattern.

Jesus Christ healed in a variety of manners.  He healed using diverse methods and means.  Consider:
*  Sometimes Jesus healed by speaking, and sometimes He touched.
*  Sometimes Jesus used spittle, and sometimes He mixed dirt with spittle  -  John 9:6.
*  Sometimes Jesus healed in one phase, and sometimes in two phases  -  Mark 8:22-26.
*  Sometimes the sick asked on behalf of themselves, and sometimes another did the asking  -  Mark 5:23.
*  Sometimes the sick were present, and sometimes the sick were absent  -  Matt 8:5-13.
In terms of method, no pattern was Jesus’ pattern.  BUT, compassion was always Jesus’ pattern.

So, let us consider our rigidity.  Sure, Jesus did everything decently and in order, as should we; however, we must ask ourselves:  Has effectiveness or method become our pattern?  Is it more Christ-like to be compassion or method driven?  In matters of method, is it more Christ-like to be effective or traditional, to be compassionate or conventional?  Written by one whose parents and children are in the church, by one who is both a parent and a child.

 

Top

Scoured Absalom
September 1, 2006




The following guarantees to be a recipe for disaster, and serves all generations.

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Ingredients:
1 pretty boy                                2Sam 14:25
     (
make sure pretty boy has pedigree)      2Sam 3:3
5 half brothers                             2Sam 3:1-5
1 non-disciplinarian father                  1King 1:5-6
1 cup of unpunished sins                   2Sam 13:14, 28-29
2 teaspoons of pomp                        2Sam 15:1
1½ tablespoons of attitude                2Sam 14:30

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Directions:
1)  Place one 200 pound pretty boy with five half brothers in a skillet. 
2)  Add a non-disciplinarian of a father, and let boil for twenty years or so. 
3)  Stir in a blue blood upbringing, an insatiable desire for pomp, and a cup of unpunished sins.  
4)  Place in a pot, cover up, and let simmer for another couple of years.
5)  Place ingredients in a lidded jar.  Glaze on attitude and let stand for another decade or two.

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

The account of Absalom can be found in chapters 13 through 18 of the Book of 2nd Samuel.  David’s untamed, unrepentant son reeked havoc on a nation, a family, and a congregation.  Could Scoured Absalom (2Sam 18:14) have been avoided?  I’m not sure, but I know parents who do not call down their children, who do not enforce the consequences of inappropriate behavior, who do not get repentance are following a recipe for disaster.  And a nation which does not correct its children, does not discipline inappropriate behavior, and seeks not repentance also follows a recipe for disaster.  Some things never change, including the indigestion brought about by undisciplined children.

Top

Any Regrets?
(September 8, 2006)


Whether a man be rich or poor, wise or foolish; the last words of a man are usually noteworthy.  Let us compare and contrast the last words of King David and the Apostle Paul.

David’s last words are recorded in 2Sam 23:1-5. 
*  Verse one is David’s resume:  raised up on high, anointed of God, and the sweet psalmist of Israel. 
*  The next verse and a half describe the source of David’s words:  the Spirit spake by David, God’s word was in him, and the Rock of Israel speaketh.
*  The next verse and a half tells what David should have been:  just, ruling in the fear of God, as light and tender.
*  But verse five starts and ends with an although:  although my house be not so with God, and although He make it not to grow.  David says he blew it with his family and it cost him earthly blessings.

Paul’s last words are recorded in 2Tim 4:6-8.
*  Paul’s resume was just as impressive as David’s:  called of God, privileged education, honor student, excellent practitioner  -  Gal 1:1, Act 22:3, Php 3:5.
*  Paul’s words were also inspired:  received as the word of God not as from men, given by the inspiration of God  -  1Thes 2:13, 2Tim 3:16-17.
*  Paul tells us what he should have been:  nurse, father, teacher, ensample  -  1Thes 2:7, 11; 2Tim 1:11; Act 20:20.
*  Verses six and seven say Paul had no regrets:  he was ready to be offered, he had fought a good fight, and he kept the faith.  Paul was more than ready to leave  -  Php 1:23-24.

A simple question:  If (today) you were on your death bed, would your last words resemble David’s or Paul’s?  Would you have any regrets?  time not spent with children?  not been baptized?  …..    Eliminate those regrets.  Start today!

Top

Would They Pick You?
(September 15, 2006)


I never cease to be amazed at the tenacity of the saints who carried their sick brother to see Jesus  -  Mark 2:1-5.  Consider the specifics of that encounter:  A man with palsy is unable to walk.  Four friends grab a corner of the man’s cot and transport him to Jesus.  The five arrive to a packed house, inside and out.  The four lift their friend to the housetop, peel back the roofing, and lower their friend to Jesus.  Don’t each of us yearn for friends like that?

Let me ask the reader a hypothetical question:  suppose you had palsy and wanted to see Jesus.  Thinking of your family, friends, and church members  -  which four would you pick to man your cot?  Let me give you some advice:

>  Don’t pick a fatalist!  The last thing you need is for one of your bearers to look at the press and say, "The Lord must not have wanted you to see Jesus today."  Get someone with more perseverance than that.
>  Don’t pick a traditionalist!  You don’t need one of your bearers to look at the housetop and say, "We better not, I’ve never seen it done that way before."  Get someone with more fortitude than that.
>  Don’t pick a sentimentalist!  You don’t need one of your bearers to grab a hold of the person peeling back the tile and say, "Stop, my grandfather laid that tile."  Get someone with more of the right kind of compassion than that.
>  Don’t pick a conformist!  You don’t need one of your bearers to be intimidated by an angry remark, "Hey, you’re getting dust on me." or "Not fair, I was here first."  Get someone with more resolve than that.

Please consider another hypothetical question:  suppose a friend or a member of your church had palsy and wanted to see Jesus.  Would they pick you to man their cot?


Top

The Lesser Offering
(September 22, 2006)



Most theologians distinguish between the two apostles named James with a reference to each’s father, James the son of Zebedee vs. James the son of Alphaeus. 
A few theologians differentiate with a manmade title, James the greater vs. James the lesser.

Let us differentiate two offerings:  The offering of Jesus’ life (which bought and paid for our eternal salvation) and the offering of the disciples’ lives (which recorded and spread the knowledge of our eternal salvation).  Granted, there is no comparing the offering made by the Son of God with the offering made by sinful men.  With that said, let us consider the apostle’s lesser offerings:

  1.  Simon Peter was crucified upside down in Rome,
  2.  James (John’s bro.) was killed with a sword in Israel,
  3.  John served much of his last days on a prison island,
  4.  Andrew was crucified in Greece,
  5.  Bartholomew was whipped to death in Turkey,
  6.  Philip was crucified in Asia Minor,
  7.  Matthew was killed with a halberd in Ethiopia,
  8.  Thomas was speared in India,
  9.  James (Alphaeus’ son) was clubbed to death in Israel,
10.  Thaddaeus was killed with an arrow in Persia,
11.  Simon (Canaanite) was crucified in Britian,
12.  Mark was dragged through the streets of Alexandria,
13.  Luke was hanged in Greece,
14.  Matthias was stoned in Jerusalem,
15.  Paul was beheaded in Rome,
16.  Barnabas was stoned in Salonica,
17.  John the Baptist was beheaded in Cesarea, and
18.  Stephen was stoned in Israel.

The good news of our eternal salvation came with a price.  The down payment is listed above.  Opposition has varied in the means and the location, but the disciples remained obedient  -  Matt 10:28, Mark 16:15.  Many more payments have been made over the years.  May we appreciate our eternal salvation, the knowledge of our eternal salvation, and the prices paid for each.

 

Top

The Scientific Method
(September 29, 2006)



The Scientific Method is a body of techniques for investigating phenomena and acquiring new knowledge, as well as for correcting and integrating previous knowledge.  It is based on observable, empirical, measurable evidence, and subject to laws of reasoning.  All this evidence is collectively called scientific evidence  -  Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Scientific process: 
   step 1)   conceive a theory,
   step 2)   deduce effects of the theory,
   step 3)   perform experiments (or observations)
   step 4)   analyze the data
   step 5)   if results confirm theory, return to step 2;  if results falsify theory, return to step 1.

The scientific method is a casualty of evolutionary school.  Hypotheses with conflicting evidence are not rejected, the unproven is used to substantiate hypotheses, and circular reasoning is common place.  The scientific method was created by its founders to rid science of bias.

Sir Francis Bacon (1561-1626) revolutionized science proposing a new way of conducting scientific experimentation.  His method:  purge the mind of prejudices, systematically collect facts, and admit when initial conclusions are wrong.  Bacon bound himself to the process, but never to his position.

Rene Descartes (1596-1650) sought the principle of material things, not by prejudices of the senses, but by the light of reason.  He emphasized the overcoming of prejudices:  can not derive meaning of particulars from particulars themselves, rather meaning must come from discerning material things.

We would do well to apply the scientific method in studying the Bible.  Bacon and Descartes’ thoughts on eliminating prejudice could well be applied to our Confessions of Faith.  Theology which contradicts a single text or Bible character’s experience ought to be abandoned.  Theology without scriptural support ought not be the basis of further creeds.  May we handle the Word of God honestly  -  2Cor 4:2, 2Pet 1:20.

Top

 

All Articles Written by Elder Dolph Painter, Moriah Primitive Baptist Church

pastordolph@aol.com

This site created by Steve McCannon. This page last updated 07/18/2008